It has lots of foliage and fine detail which the x-trans sensor of Fujifilm cameras is infamous for struggling with. This is the image I’m using for this comparison. I don't think I need to label which is from Lightdoom.Let’s compare the sharpness difference between Lightroom 6.5 and Iridient Transformer 1.0.1 when editing Fujifilm raw files. It's generally accepted by Fuji users that Adobe are lagging way behind the competition when it comes to Fuji X-Trans support and as the biggest developer with the largest budget this simply doesn't make sense. This is very frustrating to feel that as a Lightroom user and Adobe supporter I am having to put up with inferior results.Īdobe, please do us the decency of addressing the complaints, even if it's to say you have no plans to improve support - at least then the loyal customers, such as I, can finally make a call whether to migrate away to another RAW developer.Īs it stands we are waiting with baited breath hoping to maintain large libraries and edits rather than move away, but this is a long time complaint that seemingly isn't being addressed. Only today I am processing hundreds of images and what I thought were out of focus areas due to an f1.2 lens is actually just softness caused by Adobe Lightroom this was only clear to me when I demoed the latest version of Capture One Pro. Old grey Gentlemen, the Future Knocks on your door.Īdobe's lack of support and lack of any official word on this topic is still disappointing.This thread has been active for 5 months now with 31 others sharing the same issue - not a lot granted - but this isn't the only thread on this topic and it's the 13th most popular post in the "problems" section. Now i think i Found a successor with capture one but Not with lightroom.Īdobe, canon, Nikon, they all gonna end like Blackberry, Nokia, etc. Best raw convertion, good Workflow, good file Handling.Īperture Sadly is a Dead end. )Ĭapture One and Apple Aperture are the best Solution, if you want an "all-in-one" Package. I want to be on the right side of the gap. I think The guy from The photokina fujifilm Booth was right as he mentioned, that Adobe wants to earn Money and wait for LR 6 to Get this issue solved. In The ACR 8.7 Beta there is still no sign of bugfix for this issue. THEN i think about LR 6.īut i dont think that adobe cares. So why should i pay additional Money for bugfixes?!? the monthly plans and the poor image quality with x-trans sensors make that decision easy to me.
IRIDIENT DEVELOPER VS LIGHTROOM FUJI FREE
this one will be free and uses the best raw converter so far, the apple one.Ĭapture one is ok, but the image quality is not as good as apple and the workflow is very different and not as good as with aperture. I go on work with Apples Aperture as long as i could and i wait for the new photos app for mac. But that is just a guess.įact is, adobe has all they need, but they are making nothing out of it. Maybe they wait for the next version of lightroom, to make more money. He told me, that fujifilm is providing all the information to adobe that they need to improve raw converting, but adobe makes nothing out of it. I had the chance to talk to a manager of fujifilm on photokina. He told me that this is a known issue with the raw converter (no news to us) and that they are working with "high Pressure" on it. Or is it a case that the users wanting such a change are not enough to support such work.
IRIDIENT DEVELOPER VS LIGHTROOM FUJI SOFTWARE
Is Fuji X-Trans support being worked on?I appreciate that the support is better now than it was, but the reality is that Lightroom is still a long way behind other RAW developers, all of which are less well funded and with smaller teams working on the software.Lightroom has been the leader in RAW processing an image cataloging as far back as I can recall but with the Fuji X-Trans files many people I know are leaving Adobe Lightroom for one of the many other developers, all of which are producing far better results than Adobe Lightroom.Ones I have personally tested are as follows: Iridient DeveloperPhoto NinjaLightZoneCapture OneApertureSilkyPixRaw TherapeeIridient is very good, and this is a piece of software made by a single man.My question is, if he can get it right, why can't Adobe? They have been leaders in innovation for many years but it seems in some areas now they are falling behind - I have never seen so many people leave a major developer for smaller independent ones, but to Fuji users (both enthusiasts and professionals) it's a pretty simple decision when you compare results.So all I'd like to know is if my patience sticking with Lightroom is justified, and whether a solution is being worked on - or will always be worked on.
0 kommentar(er)
